This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

⛳️ The Golf

The Truist Championship

  • Course: Quail Hollow tests ball strikers

  • Weather: Classic Charlotte Spring

  • Story: Rory has 4 wins here + Course Record

The Card

  • Outright Winner: Rory McIlroy

  • Favorite Bet: Harris English Top 10

  • Fade: Viktor Hovland

📣 The Good, Bad & Ugly

GB&U: Horvat, Wesley Bros Launch Digital Creator Golf Tour

The Good: The audience is already there. The Internet Invitational last summer proved the commercial demand. Direct-to-fan distribution across pre-built channels with millions of subs means YGT skips the linear-rights problem the PGA Tour is still wrestling with. Wesley Bryan being suspended from the PGA Tour for playing LIV Duels and pivoting straight into a co-founder role is exactly the kind of operator-jumps-the-fence moment that signals the category is real.

The Bad: The whole appeal of YouTube golf was that it WASN’T a tour. Personality-first, low stakes, fun. The minute you bolt on $1M, relegation, captains, and a points race, you risk turning the antidote into the disease. “Skill-first selection” is the right answer for competitive integrity but it also raises the obvious question: if the audience came for personality, does formalizing it strand the audience that built the platform?

The Ugly: This is either the door opening for more — a creator-led tour ecosystem where Bob Does Sports, Good Good, and the rest follow with their own circuits, all feeding the same fans — or it’s SIM leagues gone mad. TGL already showed that primetime indoor golf with stars works at modest scale. YGT is the outdoor, money-on-the-line version with creator distribution. If it lands, every creator with a million subs starts asking why they don’t have their own. If it whiffs, YouTube golf goes back to vibes-only and the formal-tour experiment is dead for a decade. Right now, I’d bet on the door opening.

💰 The Wedge Fund

Brief: Saronic is building the autonomous platform for the contested-water future the Pentagon is openly planning for. One of the only companies actually delivering autonomous surface vessels at scale. The team is heavy on defense and ex-Anduril builders who’ve shipped real hardware against real DoD contracts.

Saronic: Defense Technology

Saronic: Defense Tech

Bull Case: The timing is historic. Few companies sit at the intersection of (a) a defense procurement environment that has finally cracked open, (b) a manufacturing thesis that can scale, and (c) a technology stack already battle-validated by Ukraine. Saronic has all three. Every quarter the procurement window stays open, the lead widens.

Bear Case: Defense procurement is famously slow even when budgets exist. Multi-year programs slip. Geopolitical priorities shift with administrations. Hardware businesses carry capital intensity software companies don’t. And, valuations can compress meaningfully if production timelines stall. Multi-year hold; not a quick mark-up.

Macro Environment

The U.S. Navy needs more ships and can’t build them fast enough. Traditional shipyards are slow, expensive, and backlogged a decade out. Ukraine showed the world that cheap autonomous boats can sink billion-dollar warships — a structural shift in how naval power works. The Pentagon is now spending real money on unmanned vessels, and the supply side is still tiny.

❝

Not investment advice. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Read Disclosures →

Send It.